Media

May 14, 2026

DNEWS.GR: PENSION SYSTEM REMAINS A HEAVY BURDEN ON BUDGETS IN GREECE AND THE EU

In Dnews.gr, the Centre for Liberal Studies (KEFiM), as part of the Epicenter network, presented its latest study showing that 43% of pension expenditure in Greece in 2025 continues to be funded directly from the regular state budget rather than social security contributions. The analysis highlights similar unfunded liabilities at EU level, where 79% of staff pensions are paid from the current EU budget, and calls for structural reforms including stronger capitalisation to ease long-term pressure on taxpayers and public finances.
May 14, 2026

NEWSBEAST.GR: 43% OF PENSIONS IN GREECE FUNDED BY TAXPAYERS THROUGH THE STATE BUDGET

In Newsbeast.gr, the Centre for Liberal Studies (KEFiM), as part of the Epicenter network, presented its latest study showing that 43% of pension payments in Greece in 2025 are still covered directly from the regular state budget rather than social security contributions. The analysis draws parallels with the EU institutions, where 79% of staff pensions are funded from the current EU budget, and calls for structural reforms toward greater capitalisation to reduce the burden on taxpayers and improve long-term fiscal sustainability.
May 14, 2026

PROTOTHEMA.GR: PENSION SYSTEM REMAINS A BURDEN FOR TAXPAYERS IN THE EU

In Protothema.gr, the Centre for Liberal Studies (KEFiM), as part of the Epicenter network, warned in its latest study that the pension system continues to weigh heavily on taxpayers across the EU. In Greece, 43% of pension expenditure in 2025 is still funded directly from the regular state budget rather than contributions, while similar unfunded liabilities exist at EU level. The analysis calls for structural reforms and a shift toward greater capitalisation to reduce long-term pressure on public budgets and taxpayers.
May 14, 2026

NEWSIT.GR: 43% OF PENSIONS IN GREECE FUNDED FROM THE REGULAR STATE BUDGET IN 2025

In Newsit.gr, the Centre for Liberal Studies (KEFiM), as part of the Epicenter network, highlighted that 43% of pension expenditure in Greece in 2025 was still financed directly from the regular state budget, while 57% came from contributions. The study also draws attention to the EU institutions’ own pension system, where 79% of staff pensions are funded from the current EU budget rather than accumulated reserves, and calls for a gradual shift toward stronger capital-funded models to ease long-term pressure on taxpayers and public budgets.
May 14, 2026

HUFFINGTONPOST.GR: 43% OF GREEK PENSIONS CONTINUE TO BE FUNDED BY TAXPAYERS

In HuffingtonPost.gr, the Centre for Liberal Studies (KEFiM), as part of the Epicenter network, highlighted that 43% of pension expenditure in Greece continues to be financed directly from the regular state budget rather than social security contributions. The analysis draws parallels with EU institutions, where staff pensions are largely unfunded and covered by the current EU budget, calling for reforms toward greater capitalisation and reduced long-term pressure on taxpayers.
May 12, 2026

LINKIESTA.IT: EUROPE PROPOSES NEW TAXES TO GROW, BUT THIS IS NOT THE RIGHT PATH

In Linkiesta.it, the Istituto Bruno Leoni presented Epicenter’s new study on the EU budget, criticising the European Commission’s proposal to expand the next Multiannual Financial Framework with new own resources such as the CORE corporate tax and other levies. The analysis argues that there is no need to increase the budget beyond 1% of GNI, as most additional spending objectives can be achieved at national level or by the market, and warns that new European taxes would only raise the overall fiscal burden without any offsetting reductions in national taxation.
May 12, 2026

ILFOGLIO.IT: EU BUDGET, THE RISK OF A MORE EXPENSIVE BUT LESS EFFICIENT EUROPE

In Ilfoglio.it, Carlo Stagnaro discussed the European Commission’s proposal to expand the next Multiannual Financial Framework, highlighting the risks of higher spending and new own resources. The article presents Epicenter’s new study, coordinated by Christian Năsulea, which applies a strict subsidiarity test to EU spending and argues that the budget should be capped at 1% of GNI. The analysis calls for fewer missions pursued more effectively, deep cuts to non-core programmes, and a focus on strengthening the Single Market rather than expanding fiscal centralisation and joint debt.
May 12, 2026

BTA.BG: BULGARIA HAS GREATER INTEREST IN A COMPETITIVE EUROPE THAN IN NEW EUROPEAN TAXES

In BTA.bg, the Institute for Market Economics (IME), as part of the Epicenter network, warned that new EU own resources such as the Corporate Resource for Europe (CORE) and tobacco revenue sharing would negatively affect Bulgaria, with at least 300 large companies potentially impacted. The article presents the network’s Alternative EU Budget proposal, which caps the Multiannual Financial Framework at around 1% of GNI (approximately €1.54tn), calls for deep cuts to inefficient programmes, and prioritises competitiveness, the Single Market, and genuine European public goods over fiscal centralisation.
May 12, 2026

FOCUS-NEWS.NET: IME WARNS THAT AT LEAST 300 LARGE COMPANIES IN BULGARIA COULD BE AFFECTED BY NEW EUROPEAN CORPORATE TAXATION PROPOSAL

In Focus-News.net, the Institute for Market Economics (IME), as part of the Epicenter network, warned that at least 300 large companies in Bulgaria could be negatively impacted by the European Commission’s proposed Corporate Resource for Europe (CORE). The article presents the network’s Alternative EU Budget proposal, which caps the Multiannual Financial Framework at around 1% of GNI and strongly opposes new EU own resources that would increase the overall tax burden and centralise fiscal policy.

Share this content

EPICENTER publications and contributions from our member think tanks are designed to promote the discussion of economic issues and the role of markets in solving economic and social problems. As with all EPICENTER publications, the views expressed here are those of the author and not EPICENTER or its member think tanks (which have no corporate view).

Subscribe

* indicates required

EPICENTER publications and contributions from our member think tanks are designed to promote the discussion of economic issues and the role of markets in solving economic and social problems. As with all EPICENTER publications, the views expressed here are those of the author and not EPICENTER or its member think tanks (which have no corporate view).