In BrusselsMorning.com, Marek Tatala, CEO of the Economic Freedom Foundation and part of the Epicenter network, argued that Ireland’s EU Council Presidency motto “Strength with unity” is insufficient without sustainable economic growth. Tatala stressed that competitiveness underpins prosperity, security and democratic values, calling for urgent implementation of the Draghi and Letta recommendations, a completed Single Market, a regulatory brake, and a competitiveness test for every new EU proposal. The article endorses Epicenter’s Alternative EU Budget, which prioritises genuine European public goods over a simply larger budget and rejects additional own resources that would raise taxes on citizens and businesses.

In G4Media.ro, Petar Ganev from the Institute for Market Economics (IME), as part of the Epicenter network, argued that the debate on competitiveness extends far beyond the size of the EU budget. Speaking at the Green Transition Forum 2026 on the Multiannual Financial Framework 2028–2034, Ganev noted that while Bulgaria supports stronger cohesion funding as a net beneficiary, a larger EU budget risks new own resources that could harm national competitiveness. He stressed that Europe’s competitiveness depends primarily on the effective functioning of the Single Market, reducing bureaucracy and excessive regulation, and facilitating the fundamental freedoms of the internal market, rather than simply increasing the overall budget.

In BrusselsMorning.com, Adam Bartha, Director of EPICENTER, criticised proposals for a tax on ultra-processed foods as Brussels intensifies its debate on diet, public health and fiscal policy. Bartha argued that “sin taxes never made anyone healthier or richer,” warning that such levies would punish the poorest and primarily serve to fill a fiscal gap created by the Commission’s push for a larger EU budget. Drawing on EPICENTER’s competitiveness analysis, he stressed that improved health outcomes depend on increased prosperity through faster economic growth and a more responsible EU budget rather than new punitive taxes.

In Interez.sk, the Slovak retail chain Billa reported a loss of nearly €8 million in 2025 despite rising revenues, citing the impact of the national transaction tax, higher costs and increased thefts. The article also highlights analysis from INESS, as part of the Epicenter network’s Alternative EU Budget project, showing that the proposed new EU corporate resource (CORE) would require Billa to pay approximately €750,000 to the EU budget even while making a loss. The analysis warns that such a turnover-based levy would apply regardless of profitability, further undermine European competitiveness and encroach on national tax competences.

In SeznamZpravy.cz, Michael Fanta, Chief Analyst at the Centre for Economic and Market Analyses (CETA) and part of the Epicenter network, argued that the planned EU budget for 2028–2034 is large and important for Czechia, but that Europe needs a functioning Single Market more than simply more money. Fanta stressed that redistribution alone does not guarantee prosperity and highlighted the risks of new own resources and the normalisation of joint EU borrowing, consistent with the findings of Epicenter’s Alternative EU Budget study.

In NEGlobal.eu, Petar Ganev from the Institute for Market Economics (IME), as part of the Epicenter network, criticised the European Commission’s push for new “own resources” in the next Multiannual Financial Framework (2028–2034). Ganev argued that proposals for EU-level revenues linked to corporations, carbon emissions, tobacco, and environmental levies represent a shift toward permanent EU taxing capacity, detaching fiscal decisions from national democratic accountability. The article presents Epicenter’s Alternative Multiannual Financial Framework, which caps EU spending at roughly 1% of GNI and shows that treaty obligations, support for Ukraine, research, and cohesion can be met without granting Brussels new permanent revenue streams, while calling for simplicity, fiscal neutrality, and clear limits on centralisation.

In RP.pl, Mateusz Michnik, economic analyst at the Civil Development Forum (FOR) and part of the Epicenter network, argued that Poland needs a liberal form of euro-enthusiasm that defends EU membership while ceasing to treat the Union merely as a source of subsidies. Michnik stressed that the benefits of the Single Market far outweigh financial transfers and that Poland’s eventual status as a net contributor should be seen as a success. Drawing on Epicenter’s Alternative EU Budget report, he called for a smaller, more focused Multiannual Financial Framework prioritising the completion of the Single Market, competitiveness and the removal of barriers over redistribution and industrial policy that creates privileged interest groups.

In Kathimerini.gr, the Centre for Liberal Studies (KEFiM), as part of the Epicenter network, presented a study showing that Greece’s “hidden” pension debt – future pension liabilities without corresponding accumulated savings – stands at 403% of GDP. The analysis argues that official Maastricht debt criteria systematically underestimate the real fiscal burden across the EU by excluding these unfunded obligations, with similarly high levels recorded in Spain (496%), Austria (450%) and Italy (429%). KEFiM highlights that countries with capitalised pension systems face structurally lower hidden liabilities and greater fiscal resilience, and calls for wider adoption of funded pension schemes alongside the recognition of pension commitments in official debt figures.

In LaStampa.it, Serena Sileoni of the Istituto Bruno Leoni, part of the Epicenter network, warned that the European Commission’s decision to grant flexibility on energy-related spending risks becoming more than a one-off concession. While the measure responds to Italian requests and allows limited extra deficit spending for the energy transition, Sileoni argued that it signals a growing willingness by the Commission to accommodate national pressures rather than enforce fiscal discipline. She linked the decision to the broader debate on the next Multiannual Financial Framework, noting that Epicenter’s Alternative EU Budget study shows the proposed expansion of EU spending is politically understandable but inconsistent with the Union’s founding logic, raising democratic as well as fiscal concerns.